Immigrants from Western Africa vs Barbadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,532,098 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians within Immigrant from Western Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Barbadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Africa corresponds to an increase of 4.4 Barbadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.3%), householder income over 65 years ($57,119 compared to $54,163, a difference of 5.5%), and per capita income ($40,294 compared to $42,406, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($79,490 compared to $79,664, a difference of 0.22%), median male earnings ($50,940 compared to $51,236, a difference of 0.58%), and median family income ($94,638 compared to $93,919, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 15.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 14.3%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.18%), single female poverty (22.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.4%), family households with children (28.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.060%), family households (63.1% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 73.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 38.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 14.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 28.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 34.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.0%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and college, under 1 year (62.8% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and 3rd grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 20.4%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.12%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.63%).