Immigrants from Asia vs Barbadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,002,929 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Barbadians within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.406. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Barbadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Barbadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 42.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $90,266, a difference of 29.1%), and median family income ($118,291 compared to $93,919, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $41,261, a difference of 7.1%), householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $52,202, a difference of 8.0%), and median earnings ($53,310 compared to $45,846, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 66.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 44.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 11.4%), single mother poverty (26.3% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and single female poverty (18.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 33.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 32.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.0%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 38.0%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.70%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (66.1% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 140.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 73.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 61.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 20.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 47.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 61.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 50.6%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 33.0%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 24.3%), ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.7%).