Celtic vs Barbadian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Celtic
Barbadian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Celtics
Barbadians
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,346
SOCIAL INDEX
11.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
313th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Barbadian Integration in Celtic Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,625,883 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.121% in Barbadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 121.1 Barbadians.
![Celtic Integration in Barbadian Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/celtics-vs-barbadians/celtics-vs-barbadians-community-integration.webp)
Celtic vs Barbadian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 43.8%), householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $54,163, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,896 compared to $90,266, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,732 compared to $45,846, a difference of 0.25%), per capita income ($43,621 compared to $42,406, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $89,565, a difference of 3.0%).
![Celtic vs Barbadian Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/celtics-vs-barbadians/celtics-vs-barbadians-income.webp)
Income Metric | Celtic | Barbadian |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,621 | Poor $42,406 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,139 | Tragic $93,919 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,193 | Tragic $79,664 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,732 | Fair $45,846 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,242 | Tragic $51,236 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,283 | Exceptional $41,261 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,447 | Average $52,202 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,241 | Tragic $89,565 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,896 | Tragic $90,266 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,608 | Tragic $54,163 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Celtic vs Barbadian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 51.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 46.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 0.87%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and single female poverty (22.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.0%).
![Celtic vs Barbadian Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/celtics-vs-barbadians/celtics-vs-barbadians-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Celtic | Barbadian |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 14.8% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 11.3% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 14.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 17.9% | Tragic 20.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.4% | Tragic 20.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Tragic 20.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.9% | Tragic 30.7% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 14.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 16.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 16.5% |
Celtic vs Barbadian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 37.1%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 33.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.7%).
![Celtic vs Barbadian Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/celtics-vs-barbadians/celtics-vs-barbadians-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Celtic | Barbadian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 22.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Excellent 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 8.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.4% |
Celtic vs Barbadian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 33.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.60%).
![Celtic vs Barbadian Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/celtics-vs-barbadians/celtics-vs-barbadians-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Celtic | Barbadian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.8% | Fair 65.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 78.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.3% | Tragic 31.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Fair 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Fair 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Tragic 81.6% |
Celtic vs Barbadian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.8%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 20.1%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.8%).
![Celtic vs Barbadian Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/celtics-vs-barbadians/celtics-vs-barbadians-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Celtic | Barbadian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.8% | Tragic 62.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.3% | Tragic 39.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.8% | Tragic 40.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.0% | Average 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Tragic 37.0% |
Celtic vs Barbadian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 223.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 81.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 72.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 24.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 54.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 72.3%).
![Celtic vs Barbadian Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/celtics-vs-barbadians/celtics-vs-barbadians-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Celtic | Barbadian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 26.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.1% | Tragic 74.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Tragic 38.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 12.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 3.9% |
Celtic vs Barbadian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 59.1%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and college, under 1 year (65.9% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.40%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
![Celtic vs Barbadian Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/celtics-vs-barbadians/celtics-vs-barbadians-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Celtic | Barbadian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 94.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Tragic 93.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 92.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.7% | Tragic 90.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 89.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Tragic 86.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.7% | Tragic 82.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.9% | Tragic 61.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 56.0% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Tragic 43.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Poor 36.1% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.8% | Fair 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.6% |
Celtic vs Barbadian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 61.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 47.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 0.11%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
![Celtic vs Barbadian Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/celtics-vs-barbadians/celtics-vs-barbadians-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Celtic | Barbadian |
Disability | Tragic 13.1% | Poor 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.0% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 24.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.2% | Tragic 48.0% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Good 17.1% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 6.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |