Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Barbadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,216,158 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians within Immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.196% in Barbadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago corresponds to an increase of 196.3 Barbadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,598 compared to $54,163, a difference of 2.6%), per capita income ($41,476 compared to $42,406, a difference of 2.2%), and wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($93,988 compared to $93,919, a difference of 0.070%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,748 compared to $89,565, a difference of 0.20%), and median earnings ($45,729 compared to $45,846, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (19.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.36%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (41.2% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 4.6%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.24%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 6.1%), no vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.8% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 9.1%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.6% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (96.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 9.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.1%).