Asian vs Barbadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,078,568 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Barbadians within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.305. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Barbadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Barbadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 42.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $90,266, a difference of 31.2%), and median family income ($119,955 compared to $93,919, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $41,261, a difference of 8.1%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $52,202, a difference of 9.2%), and median earnings ($53,690 compared to $45,846, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 70.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 49.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 13.7%), single mother poverty (26.0% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and single female poverty (18.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 34.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 33.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.4%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 38.0%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.36%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (66.5% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 190.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 79.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 23.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 48.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 65.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 50.8%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 33.1%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 25.6%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 25.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.3%).