Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Barbadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,772,804 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.718. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.688% in Barbadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 687.9 Barbadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 33.6%), householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $54,163, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $90,266, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $52,202, a difference of 0.56%), median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $41,261, a difference of 0.65%), and median earnings ($48,913 compared to $45,846, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 65.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 44.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.3%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 38.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 37.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.2%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 21.9%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (63.5% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 164.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 54.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 21.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 45.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 51.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.7%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.0%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.8%), male disability (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.4%).