Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,631,393 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Immigrant from Eastern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.364. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Africa corresponds to a decrease of 11.2 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 19.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,458 compared to $99,429, a difference of 8.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,467 compared to $105,309, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,157 compared to $61,440, a difference of 0.46%), median female earnings ($40,644 compared to $40,177, a difference of 1.2%), and per capita income ($43,838 compared to $44,362, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 20.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 16.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (42.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 11.3%), births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and family households (61.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.080%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 29.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 21.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.4%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 18.4%), and master's degree (16.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and 5th grade (96.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 24.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 0.30%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.3%).