Iroquois vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,867,758 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.621. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.178% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 178.3 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $105,309, a difference of 20.7%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $88,976, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $99,429, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 9.1%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $40,177, a difference of 10.3%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $48,032, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 33.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 33.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 9.5%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 13.0%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.94%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 27.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.0%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 20.2%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 6.9%).