Bhutanese vs Portuguese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Portuguese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Portuguese

Exceptional
Average
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,363
SOCIAL INDEX
41.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
201st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Portuguese Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,594,086 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.413. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 89.9 Portuguese.
Bhutanese Integration in Portuguese Communities

Bhutanese vs Portuguese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $61,440, a difference of 17.7%), median family income ($119,800 compared to $106,286, a difference of 12.7%), and median household income ($100,151 compared to $88,976, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $54,436, a difference of 4.9%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $40,177, a difference of 8.6%).
Bhutanese vs Portuguese Income
Income MetricBhutanesePortuguese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Good
$44,362
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Excellent
$106,286
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Exceptional
$88,976
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Exceptional
$48,032
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Excellent
$56,663
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Good
$40,177
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Exceptional
$54,436
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Exceptional
$99,429
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Exceptional
$105,309
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Good
$61,440
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
27.4%

Bhutanese vs Portuguese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 32.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 11.5%).
Bhutanese vs Portuguese Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutanesePortuguese
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Excellent
8.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Exceptional
17.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Average
13.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Excellent
16.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Excellent
15.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Excellent
20.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Fair
12.2%

Bhutanese vs Portuguese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 29.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.8%).
Bhutanese vs Portuguese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutanesePortuguese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.6%

Bhutanese vs Portuguese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Bhutanese vs Portuguese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutanesePortuguese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
64.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Exceptional
40.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Exceptional
76.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Fair
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
82.2%

Bhutanese vs Portuguese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 21.3%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.9%).
Bhutanese vs Portuguese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutanesePortuguese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
65.8%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
33.8%

Bhutanese vs Portuguese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.20%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Bhutanese vs Portuguese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutanesePortuguese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
91.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
58.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.4%

Bhutanese vs Portuguese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 33.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.6%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.30%).
Bhutanese vs Portuguese Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutanesePortuguese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Poor
93.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
92.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Poor
90.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Tragic
63.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Tragic
44.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Poor
13.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Fair
1.8%

Bhutanese vs Portuguese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 25.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 7.8%).
Bhutanese vs Portuguese Disability
Disability MetricBhutanesePortuguese
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Fair
23.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Fair
47.6%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%