Australian vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,153,139 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.152% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 152.4 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $44,362, a difference of 17.4%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $106,286, a difference of 11.4%), and median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $56,663, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $54,436, a difference of 1.3%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $40,177, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 26.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 17.0%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.88%), female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.5%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.49%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.89%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 17.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 44.9%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.9%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 17.1%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 6.7%).