Asian vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 444,406,280 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.215. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to an increase of 4.2 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($101,681 compared to $88,976, a difference of 14.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $99,429, a difference of 13.3%), and median family income ($119,955 compared to $106,286, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $54,436, a difference of 4.7%), and median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $40,177, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 25.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 19.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.56%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 26.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 17.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 26.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (48.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.28 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 38.7%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 35.6%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (96.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 48.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 10.0%).