Zimbabwean vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,585,483 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 11.3 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,440, a difference of 7.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,436, a difference of 6.2%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,229 compared to $48,032, a difference of 0.41%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $56,663, a difference of 0.64%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $99,429, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 28.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 17.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and poverty (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 17.9%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.38%), currently married (47.0% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.60%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.7%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 27.9%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.3%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.2%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 9.1%).