Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,453,554 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Immigrant from Romania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.519. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.181% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Romania corresponds to an increase of 180.5 Immigrants from Nepal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,463 compared to $44,187, a difference of 11.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,713 compared to $95,322, a difference of 9.9%), and median male earnings ($61,040 compared to $55,615, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,462 compared to $61,843, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($42,718 compared to $40,704, a difference of 5.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,522 compared to $52,611, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 14.8%), poverty (11.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and female poverty (12.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and married-couple households (48.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.21%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.80%), and family households (64.6% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.95%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.1%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 13.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.43%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.8%).