Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,506,208 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 57.2 Immigrants from Nepal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $44,187, a difference of 29.9%), median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $55,615, a difference of 23.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($117,219 compared to $95,322, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $52,611, a difference of 6.3%), householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $61,843, a difference of 13.0%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 13.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.3%), male poverty (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 25.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.5%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.3%), and births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.29%), family households (63.4% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 48.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 64.1%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.9%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.2% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.32%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 22.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (19.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.3%).