Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,748,441 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.168. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.075% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 74.8 Immigrants from Nepal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,983 compared to $44,187, a difference of 13.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,650 compared to $95,322, a difference of 12.9%), and median male earnings ($62,121 compared to $55,615, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $52,611, a difference of 3.0%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $61,843, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.29%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.49%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (64.0% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 29.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.4%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.0%).