Immigrants from Philippines vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,655,894 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to an increase of 2.2 Immigrants from Nepal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($57,930 compared to $52,611, a difference of 10.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,910 compared to $95,322, a difference of 8.0%), and median household income ($93,899 compared to $87,046, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,809 compared to $55,615, a difference of 0.35%), per capita income ($44,000 compared to $44,187, a difference of 0.43%), and median earnings ($48,266 compared to $47,925, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 23.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.86%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (49.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 9.1%), family households (68.3% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.1%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 53.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 34.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.6%), master's degree (13.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 24.6%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 2.5%).