Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,692,786 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to an increase of 2.3 Immigrants from Nepal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $95,322, a difference of 16.2%), median household income ($99,933 compared to $87,046, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $102,190, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $52,611, a difference of 7.2%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $40,704, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 15.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.37%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.4%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 14.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.30%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.1%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 0.66%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.3%).