Immigrants from Serbia vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,343,614 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Immigrant from Serbia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Serbia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.215% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Serbia corresponds to an increase of 214.6 Immigrants from Nepal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,810 compared to $44,187, a difference of 15.0%), median male earnings ($60,600 compared to $55,615, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,155 compared to $95,322, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,321 compared to $52,611, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($63,387 compared to $61,843, a difference of 2.5%), and wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 11.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.7%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.12%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.66%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.7%), family households with children (25.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.38%), married-couple households (45.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (61.6% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 13.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.8%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.5%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 13.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.3%), disability (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.6%).