Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in North Dakota [ 101 - 200 ]

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Seniors 65+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in North Dakota

City Senior Poverty vs State vs National
101. Williston 14.2% 9.1% (+5.11)#101 10.0% (+4.27)#8,089
102. Tioga 14.2% 9.1% (+5.04)#102 10.0% (+4.21)#8,136
103. Dickinson 14.1% 9.1% (+5.02)#103 10.0% (+4.18)#8,161
104. Devils Lake 14.1% 9.1% (+4.97)#104 10.0% (+4.14)#8,189
105. Kenmare 14.1% 9.1% (+4.95)#105 10.0% (+4.11)#8,210
106. Minot 14.0% 9.1% (+4.91)#106 10.0% (+4.07)#8,246
107. Coleharbor 14.0% 9.1% (+4.84)#107 10.0% (+4.00)#8,298
108. Forman 13.8% 9.1% (+4.72)#108 10.0% (+3.88)#8,401
109. Grafton 13.7% 9.1% (+4.61)#109 10.0% (+3.78)#8,505
110. Edinburg 13.7% 9.1% (+4.61)#110 10.0% (+3.77)#8,518
111. Gackle 13.6% 9.1% (+4.52)#111 10.0% (+3.68)#8,596
112. Hannaford 13.5% 9.1% (+4.40)#112 10.0% (+3.56)#8,703
113. Cavalier 13.5% 9.1% (+4.38)#113 10.0% (+3.54)#8,711
114. Powers Lake 13.5% 9.1% (+4.35)#114 10.0% (+3.51)#8,751
115. Balta 13.3% 9.1% (+4.22)#115 10.0% (+3.38)#8,892
116. Overly 13.3% 9.1% (+4.22)#116 10.0% (+3.38)#8,895
117. Turtle Lake 13.3% 9.1% (+4.16)#117 10.0% (+3.32)#8,931
118. Tolna 13.3% 9.1% (+4.14)#118 10.0% (+3.30)#8,945
119. Fairmount 13.2% 9.1% (+4.04)#119 10.0% (+3.21)#9,030
120. Hazelton 13.0% 9.1% (+3.93)#120 10.0% (+3.09)#9,140
121. Pekin 13.0% 9.1% (+3.93)#121 10.0% (+3.09)#9,150
122. Upham 12.9% 9.1% (+3.79)#122 10.0% (+2.95)#9,259
123. Wilton 12.8% 9.1% (+3.70)#123 10.0% (+2.87)#9,324
124. Mayville 12.8% 9.1% (+3.67)#124 10.0% (+2.84)#9,350
125. Lansford 12.5% 9.1% (+3.38)#125 10.0% (+2.55)#9,648
126. Litchville 12.5% 9.1% (+3.38)#126 10.0% (+2.55)#9,656
127. Verona 12.5% 9.1% (+3.38)#127 10.0% (+2.55)#9,663
128. Selfridge 12.2% 9.1% (+3.08)#128 10.0% (+2.24)#9,946
129. Gladstone 12.0% 9.1% (+2.88)#129 10.0% (+2.05)#10,159
130. Velva 12.0% 9.1% (+2.86)#130 10.0% (+2.02)#10,179
131. Beach 11.9% 9.1% (+2.80)#131 10.0% (+1.97)#10,223
132. Manvel 11.9% 9.1% (+2.75)#132 10.0% (+1.91)#10,285
133. Spiritwood Lake 11.8% 9.1% (+2.65)#133 10.0% (+1.81)#10,407
134. Mercer 11.8% 9.1% (+2.65)#134 10.0% (+1.81)#10,414
135. Page 11.4% 9.1% (+2.31)#135 10.0% (+1.48)#10,755
136. Wahpeton 11.4% 9.1% (+2.31)#136 10.0% (+1.47)#10,763
137. Killdeer 11.3% 9.1% (+2.20)#137 10.0% (+1.37)#10,864
138. Sawyer 11.3% 9.1% (+2.20)#138 10.0% (+1.37)#10,874
139. Lisbon 11.1% 9.1% (+2.02)#139 10.0% (+1.19)#11,057
140. Glen Ullin 11.0% 9.1% (+1.84)#140 10.0% (+1.00)#11,297
141. New Leipzig 10.9% 9.1% (+1.82)#141 10.0% (+0.986)#11,318
142. Kulm 10.9% 9.1% (+1.75)#142 10.0% (+0.918)#11,405
143. Cooperstown 10.6% 9.1% (+1.44)#143 10.0% (+0.601)#11,760
144. Hillsboro 10.5% 9.1% (+1.36)#144 10.0% (+0.521)#11,863
145. Horace 10.5% 9.1% (+1.34)#145 10.0% (+0.503)#11,885
146. Hebron 10.1% 9.1% (+1.02)#146 10.0% (+0.183)#12,303
147. Thompson 10.0% 9.1% (+0.883)#147 10.0% (+0.048)#12,441
148. Granville 10.0% 9.1% (+0.883)#148 10.0% (+0.048)#12,473
149. Columbus 10.0% 9.1% (+0.883)#149 10.0% (+0.048)#12,520
150. Bowdon 9.8% 9.1% (+0.687)#150 10.0% (-0.148)#12,752
151. Bowman 9.7% 9.1% (+0.611)#151 10.0% (-0.224)#12,850
152. Strasburg 9.7% 9.1% (+0.606)#152 10.0% (-0.229)#12,862
153. Napoleon 9.6% 9.1% (+0.458)#153 10.0% (-0.377)#13,071
154. Fordville 9.5% 9.1% (+0.407)#154 10.0% (-0.428)#13,139
155. Oakes 9.4% 9.1% (+0.326)#155 10.0% (-0.510)#13,228
156. Rugby 9.3% 9.1% (+0.223)#156 10.0% (-0.612)#13,345
157. New Rockford 9.3% 9.1% (+0.221)#157 10.0% (-0.614)#13,348
158. Davenport 9.1% 9.1% (-0.026)#158 10.0% (-0.861)#13,672
159. Mcville 8.9% 9.1% (-0.173)#159 10.0% (-1.01)#13,841
160. Sheldon 8.7% 9.1% (-0.421)#160 10.0% (-1.26)#14,186
161. Edgeley 8.6% 9.1% (-0.487)#161 10.0% (-1.32)#14,271
162. Grand Forks 8.6% 9.1% (-0.539)#162 10.0% (-1.37)#14,348
163. New England 8.6% 9.1% (-0.545)#163 10.0% (-1.38)#14,359
164. Palermo 8.6% 9.1% (-0.545)#164 10.0% (-1.38)#14,382
165. Leeds 8.5% 9.1% (-0.606)#165 10.0% (-1.44)#14,449
166. Bowbells 8.5% 9.1% (-0.642)#166 10.0% (-1.48)#14,499
167. Glenfield 8.3% 9.1% (-0.783)#167 10.0% (-1.62)#14,726
168. Buxton 8.2% 9.1% (-0.897)#168 10.0% (-1.73)#14,845
169. Underwood 8.1% 9.1% (-0.977)#169 10.0% (-1.81)#14,954
170. Enderlin 8.1% 9.1% (-1.05)#170 10.0% (-1.89)#15,059
171. Harvey 8.0% 9.1% (-1.11)#171 10.0% (-1.94)#15,130
172. Forest River 8.0% 9.1% (-1.12)#172 10.0% (-1.95)#15,169
173. Adams 8.0% 9.1% (-1.12)#173 10.0% (-1.95)#15,170
174. Drayton 7.9% 9.1% (-1.21)#174 10.0% (-2.04)#15,286
175. Richardton 7.9% 9.1% (-1.24)#175 10.0% (-2.08)#15,338
176. St Thomas 7.8% 9.1% (-1.27)#176 10.0% (-2.11)#15,391
177. Petersburg 7.8% 9.1% (-1.27)#177 10.0% (-2.11)#15,394
178. Stanley 7.8% 9.1% (-1.35)#178 10.0% (-2.18)#15,480
179. Ryder 7.7% 9.1% (-1.42)#179 10.0% (-2.26)#15,645
180. Ellendale 7.6% 9.1% (-1.52)#180 10.0% (-2.35)#15,756
181. Leonard 7.5% 9.1% (-1.57)#181 10.0% (-2.40)#15,834
182. Burlington 7.5% 9.1% (-1.64)#182 10.0% (-2.48)#15,929
183. Bismarck 7.4% 9.1% (-1.67)#183 10.0% (-2.51)#15,974
184. Dodge 7.4% 9.1% (-1.71)#184 10.0% (-2.54)#16,044
185. Northwood 7.3% 9.1% (-1.82)#185 10.0% (-2.66)#16,170
186. Shell Valley 7.1% 9.1% (-1.97)#186 10.0% (-2.81)#16,355
187. Wyndmere 7.1% 9.1% (-1.97)#187 10.0% (-2.81)#16,376
188. Martin 7.1% 9.1% (-1.97)#188 10.0% (-2.81)#16,414
189. Zeeland 7.0% 9.1% (-2.10)#189 10.0% (-2.93)#16,567
190. Tower City 6.8% 9.1% (-2.34)#190 10.0% (-3.17)#16,902
191. Hoople 6.7% 9.1% (-2.45)#191 10.0% (-3.29)#17,096
192. Zap 6.7% 9.1% (-2.45)#192 10.0% (-3.29)#17,108
193. Dunseith 6.5% 9.1% (-2.66)#193 10.0% (-3.50)#17,406
194. Rolette 6.4% 9.1% (-2.73)#194 10.0% (-3.57)#17,495
195. Portland 6.4% 9.1% (-2.75)#195 10.0% (-3.59)#17,526
196. Lincoln 6.3% 9.1% (-2.77)#196 10.0% (-3.61)#17,555
197. Hazen 6.2% 9.1% (-2.96)#197 10.0% (-3.79)#17,831
198. Beulah 6.0% 9.1% (-3.12)#198 10.0% (-3.95)#18,083
199. Lidgerwood 6.0% 9.1% (-3.15)#199 10.0% (-3.98)#18,133
200. Mohall 5.9% 9.1% (-3.23)#200 10.0% (-4.07)#18,275