Pennsylvania German vs Immigrants from Colombia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,875,212 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Colombia within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.478. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Immigrants from Colombia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to a decrease of 29.5 Immigrants from Colombia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 26.3%), per capita income ($37,842 compared to $42,971, a difference of 13.6%), and median female earnings ($34,802 compared to $38,913, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,878 compared to $52,725, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,852 compared to $53,714, a difference of 5.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,956 compared to $97,290, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 30.5%), single male poverty (15.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 28.8%), and single father poverty (20.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.37%), poverty (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty (13.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 44.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 38.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.9%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and currently married (49.6% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.20%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 42.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 29.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 1.9%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 62.9%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 50.3%), and master's degree (10.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.3% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.52%), high school diploma (87.0% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and 10th grade (91.9% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 62.2%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 38.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.3%).