Pennsylvania German vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,463,099 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to an increase of 34.2 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 24.2%), per capita income ($37,842 compared to $43,464, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,888 compared to $59,848, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,852 compared to $52,643, a difference of 3.5%), median male earnings ($50,878 compared to $53,237, a difference of 4.6%), and median earnings ($42,615 compared to $45,928, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 24.1%), single father poverty (20.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 23.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), poverty (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty (13.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 33.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 30.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.8%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and currently married (49.6% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.79%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.59%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.8%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 47.5%), and master's degree (10.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.3% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.73%), 10th grade (91.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and high school diploma (87.0% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.8%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.72%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%).