Pennsylvania German vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,267,106 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Finns within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to an increase of 3.3 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,842 compared to $43,461, a difference of 14.8%), householder income over 65 years ($52,888 compared to $59,535, a difference of 12.6%), and median family income ($91,763 compared to $102,676, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,852 compared to $51,827, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and median male earnings ($50,878 compared to $54,721, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 21.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and poverty (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 34.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 7.4%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households (66.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.6% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 43.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.28%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 40.4%), master's degree (10.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 31.8%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 22.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.070%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%).