Pennsylvania German vs Immigrants from Argentina Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,594,712 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.089. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Argentina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Immigrants from Argentina.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,842 compared to $49,627, a difference of 31.1%), median household income ($75,814 compared to $92,417, a difference of 21.9%), and median family income ($91,763 compared to $110,873, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,852 compared to $54,209, a difference of 6.6%), wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 14.4%), and median male earnings ($50,878 compared to $59,491, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 30.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 28.6%), and single father poverty (20.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and female poverty (13.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 44.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 27.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 41.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.9%), births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.33%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.78%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 21.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.41%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 98.1%), master's degree (10.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 67.2%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 61.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 58.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 37.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.1%).