Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,526,215 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.194. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 28.8 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $55,543, a difference of 15.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $93,661, a difference of 13.9%), and wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $59,934, a difference of 2.7%), median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $39,376, a difference of 3.7%), and median family income ($93,593 compared to $97,958, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 24.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 23.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.58%), receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 22.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.5%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 62.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 44.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.73%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 57.4%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 36.6%), and no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 42.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 23.7%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.9%).