Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Central American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,096,431 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.222% in Central Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 222.4 Central Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Central American communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $52,626, a difference of 9.8%), median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $36,492, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $56,321, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,293 compared to $90,951, a difference of 0.38%), median household income ($77,559 compared to $78,803, a difference of 1.6%), and median male earnings ($49,201 compared to $48,093, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Central American communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 22.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.0%), single female poverty (22.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Central American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Central American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Central American communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.6%), family households (61.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.0% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 0.83%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Central American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 12.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.70%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 41.3%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.9%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Central American communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.0%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.1%), female disability (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.9%).