Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,291,336 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.188. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.159% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to a decrease of 158.6 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $110,787, a difference of 34.7%), median household income ($77,559 compared to $99,933, a difference of 28.8%), and median male earnings ($49,201 compared to $63,240, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $67,594, a difference of 15.8%), median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $44,198, a difference of 16.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $56,379, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 37.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 37.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 17.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 37.8%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 30.4%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.54%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (61.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.67%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.9%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 26.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.23%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%).