Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Okinawan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,353,156 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Okinawans within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.138. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Okinawans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 11.1 Okinawans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $119,349, a difference of 45.1%), per capita income ($39,529 compared to $55,817, a difference of 41.2%), and median family income ($93,593 compared to $129,979, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $54,701, a difference of 14.2%), householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $70,846, a difference of 21.4%), and median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $46,905, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 47.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 46.8%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.42%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 21.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 54.1%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.4%), and births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.9% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 0.91%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 4.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 74.0%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 73.4%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 27.8%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 5.0%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.6%).