Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,281,772 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 1.2 Immigrants from Turkey.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $107,258, a difference of 30.4%), per capita income ($39,529 compared to $51,368, a difference of 29.9%), and median male earnings ($49,201 compared to $62,728, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $52,503, a difference of 9.6%), householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $66,672, a difference of 14.2%), and median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $44,066, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 32.2%), receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 31.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.31%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.7%), and births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 0.27%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 46.7%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.7%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.9%).