Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,601,565 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to a decrease of 13.0 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 18.1%), median female earnings ($39,910 compared to $35,629, a difference of 12.0%), and per capita income ($41,709 compared to $37,407, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $56,089, a difference of 1.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,208 compared to $90,811, a difference of 1.5%), and median household income ($80,722 compared to $78,166, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 16.1%), and receiving food stamps (15.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.24%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 18.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 19.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.59%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 36.0%), births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.43, a difference of 1.9%), currently married (43.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (63.9% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 183.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 115.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 85.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 22.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 51.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 85.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 37.6%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 36.1%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.2%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 25.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.24%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.1%).