Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Dutch West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,063,119 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Dutch West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to an increase of 2.4 Dutch West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 25.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,714 compared to $45,816, a difference of 19.4%), and median household income ($80,722 compared to $68,412, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $50,475, a difference of 9.7%), median male earnings ($51,642 compared to $46,656, a difference of 10.7%), and median earnings ($45,532 compared to $40,107, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 24.7%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 23.8%), and single female poverty (22.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.010%), male poverty (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.77%), and poverty (15.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 27.6%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.75%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.23, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 130.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 82.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 66.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 19.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 43.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 66.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.5%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 45.6%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (81.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.36%), 12th grade, no diploma (88.0% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and high school diploma (85.5% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 126.9%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 75.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.4%).