Immigrants from Oceania vs Nonimmigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,528,653 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.856. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.759% in Nonimmigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 758.8 Nonimmigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,100 compared to $79,429, a difference of 12.2%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $57,426, a difference of 12.2%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $40,669, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.0%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $52,170, a difference of 6.8%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $44,117, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.1%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 17.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 16.2%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.080%), family households (64.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.15%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.9%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.18%), ged/equivalency (85.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and high school diploma (88.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.070%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 4.4%).