Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Nonimmigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,700,552 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants within Immigrant from Sri Lanka communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.214. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sri Lanka within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.276% in Nonimmigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sri Lanka corresponds to an increase of 2,275.8 Nonimmigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,094 compared to $94,448, a difference of 26.1%), median household income ($99,943 compared to $79,429, a difference of 25.8%), and median family income ($120,263 compared to $96,231, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.17%), householder income under 25 years ($54,512 compared to $49,348, a difference of 10.5%), and median female earnings ($44,161 compared to $37,024, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 36.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 33.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 30.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.56%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 66.2%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 58.2%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.12%), 9th grade (95.1% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 37.9%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.7%).