Immigrants from Guyana vs Nonimmigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,752,091 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants within Immigrant from Guyana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.499. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guyana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.349% in Nonimmigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guyana corresponds to a decrease of 1,348.9 Nonimmigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 48.2%), householder income under 25 years ($55,726 compared to $49,348, a difference of 12.9%), and median female earnings ($40,773 compared to $37,024, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($40,742 compared to $40,669, a difference of 0.18%), median household income ($80,324 compared to $79,429, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,586 compared to $88,301, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 36.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 32.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.62%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 42.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 33.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.3% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 47.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.4%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and married-couple households (41.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%), births to unmarried women (35.0% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 273.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 112.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 93.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 30.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.0% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 67.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 93.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 73.7%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.1%), and college, under 1 year (58.5% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (33.9% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 0.64%), master's degree (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 54.4%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.49%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.1%).