Immigrants from Japan vs Nonimmigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,161,644 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants within Immigrant from Japan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.436. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Japan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.424% in Nonimmigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Japan corresponds to a decrease of 423.6 Nonimmigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,359 compared to $40,669, a difference of 31.2%), median family income ($122,764 compared to $96,231, a difference of 27.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,228 compared to $88,301, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($55,932 compared to $49,348, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,774 compared to $57,426, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 43.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 38.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 35.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.7% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 34.5%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.30%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 44.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 65.6%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 63.2%), and master's degree (20.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 49.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 36.7%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.2%).