Immigrants from El Salvador vs Nonimmigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,853,052 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants within Immigrant from El Salvador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.552. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from El Salvador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.691% in Nonimmigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from El Salvador corresponds to a decrease of 691.2 Nonimmigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 19.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,599 compared to $49,348, a difference of 10.6%), and median male earnings ($47,973 compared to $52,170, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,673 compared to $37,024, a difference of 0.96%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,176 compared to $94,448, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,226 compared to $57,426, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.5%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 25.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (20.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.5%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.4% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (67.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and married-couple households (44.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 31.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 115.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 16.1%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1st grade (96.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 47.6%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 38.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.19%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.0%).