Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Nonimmigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,003,786 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.068. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.285% in Nonimmigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 285.5 Nonimmigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $88,301, a difference of 45.1%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $79,429, a difference of 40.4%), and per capita income ($56,709 compared to $40,669, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.5%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $57,426, a difference of 24.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $49,348, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 58.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 50.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 53.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 39.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 31.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 50.7%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 38.2%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.090%), family households (66.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 43.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 65.0%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 64.4%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.10%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 69.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 59.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.4%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.5%).