Chickasaw vs Estonian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Estonian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Estonians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,730
SOCIAL INDEX
84.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
54th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Estonian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,113,439 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.889. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.639% in Estonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 639.3 Estonians.
![Chickasaw Integration in Estonian Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-estonians/chickasaw-vs-estonians-community-integration.webp)
Chickasaw vs Estonian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $51,875, a difference of 42.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $114,220, a difference of 39.0%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $118,013, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.33%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,523, a difference of 15.1%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $43,106, a difference of 25.3%).
![Chickasaw vs Estonian Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-estonians/chickasaw-vs-estonians-income.webp)
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Estonian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $51,875 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $118,013 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $95,930 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $51,772 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $61,710 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $43,106 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Poor $51,523 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $107,269 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $114,220 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $67,926 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.1% |
Chickasaw vs Estonian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 47.3%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 44.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 16.7%).
![Chickasaw vs Estonian Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-estonians/chickasaw-vs-estonians-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Estonian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Average 16.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Chickasaw vs Estonian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.18%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.0%).
![Chickasaw vs Estonian Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-estonians/chickasaw-vs-estonians-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Estonian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Good 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chickasaw vs Estonian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.0%).
![Chickasaw vs Estonian Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-estonians/chickasaw-vs-estonians-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Estonian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 37.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Chickasaw vs Estonian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 32.1%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 3.4%).
![Chickasaw vs Estonian Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-estonians/chickasaw-vs-estonians-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Estonian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 62.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.10 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 29.2% |
Chickasaw vs Estonian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.7%).
![Chickasaw vs Estonian Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-estonians/chickasaw-vs-estonians-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Estonian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 56.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Good 19.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Average 6.4% |
Chickasaw vs Estonian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 77.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 67.5%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
![Chickasaw vs Estonian Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-estonians/chickasaw-vs-estonians-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Estonian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.3% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.2% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 70.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 52.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 44.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Chickasaw vs Estonian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 51.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.0%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.6%).
![Chickasaw vs Estonian Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-estonians/chickasaw-vs-estonians-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Estonian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Average 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Fair 11.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Excellent 12.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.6% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.3% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |