Creek vs Estonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,980,010 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.770. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.188% in Estonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 187.6 Estonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,546 compared to $51,875, a difference of 45.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $114,220, a difference of 44.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $107,269, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.21%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $51,523, a difference of 13.6%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $43,106, a difference of 28.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 63.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 56.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.9%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 28.7%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.10, a difference of 3.1%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 92.3%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 87.8%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 78.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 58.9%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.3%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.4%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 12.9%).