Malaysian vs Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,841,742 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.280. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 33.5 Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,194 compared to $45,858, a difference of 17.0%), median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $57,286, a difference of 12.8%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $52,336, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $39,724, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $62,230, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and family poverty (9.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.83%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.4%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.090%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.9%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.55%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 65.3%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 37.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.63%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.9%).