Chickasaw vs Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,656,821 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Canadians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 10.6 Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $104,560, a difference of 27.2%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $45,858, a difference of 25.7%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $87,769, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.6%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $39,724, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $62,230, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 30.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 32.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.9%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.070%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.6%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.50%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 39.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 37.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 37.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 9.9%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.9%).