Chippewa vs Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,591,461 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Canadians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.010. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 0.7 Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $45,858, a difference of 25.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $104,560, a difference of 24.6%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $87,769, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $52,336, a difference of 11.3%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $39,724, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 40.3%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 39.2%), and male poverty (14.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.9%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 70.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 40.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 35.6%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 34.7%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 13.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 37.4%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 34.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 27.9%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.0%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.7%).