Argentinean vs Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,550,224 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.038% in Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 37.9 Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $45,858, a difference of 8.7%), median household income ($93,960 compared to $87,769, a difference of 7.0%), and median family income ($112,665 compared to $106,597, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $52,336, a difference of 3.5%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $62,230, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 19.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 17.9%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.46%), poverty (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and female poverty (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.53%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 20.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 6.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.81%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 34.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.7%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 27.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.86%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.7%).