Crow vs Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,155,051 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Canadians within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.265. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 12.5 Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 47.7%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $45,858, a difference of 44.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $104,560, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $52,336, a difference of 11.3%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $39,724, a difference of 12.6%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $47,911, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 110.4%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 96.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 85.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 27.3%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 31.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 41.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 241.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 230.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 227.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.2%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 26.4%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 32.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 48.1%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 47.5%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.18%), 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and 11th grade (92.9% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 24.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 21.9%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.46%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.0%).