Sierra Leonean vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,335,937 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Sierra Leonean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sierra Leoneans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.225% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sierra Leoneans corresponds to a decrease of 224.6 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,038 compared to $53,265, a difference of 22.1%), median female earnings ($42,868 compared to $35,307, a difference of 21.4%), and median family income ($103,859 compared to $86,989, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 10.7%), householder income under 25 years ($57,272 compared to $51,387, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,435 compared to $82,166, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 40.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 37.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.7%), single father poverty (17.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.6%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and family households (63.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 0.79%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.91%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 50.1%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 48.9%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.2%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.66%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.4%).