Japanese vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,709,996 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.307. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.251% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to a decrease of 251.1 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($97,288 compared to $86,989, a difference of 11.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,624 compared to $82,166, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,834 compared to $87,219, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 0.25%), householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $51,387, a difference of 1.9%), and per capita income ($39,870 compared to $36,823, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.6%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 3.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.8%), births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.4% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 0.81%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.5%), master's degree (12.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 10.9%), and bachelor's degree (33.3% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 1st grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.2%).