Malaysian vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,563,106 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.058% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to a decrease of 58.4 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($95,230 compared to $86,989, a difference of 9.5%), householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $53,265, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,517 compared to $87,219, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $51,387, a difference of 0.44%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $35,307, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 34.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 32.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.62%), single female poverty (22.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.4%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 9.7%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and currently married (45.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.8% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 0.47%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and family households (65.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 34.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 18.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and college, under 1 year (62.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 0.66%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.5%).