West Indian vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,707,082 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.371% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 West Indians corresponds to an increase of 370.9 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between West Indian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 21.3%), median female earnings ($40,317 compared to $35,307, a difference of 14.2%), and per capita income ($41,217 compared to $36,823, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,583 compared to $51,387, a difference of 0.38%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,906 compared to $87,219, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,936 compared to $53,265, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between West Indian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.9%), single father poverty (18.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.31%), poverty (15.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between West Indian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between West Indian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.4% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between West Indian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.8%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and married-couple households (40.3% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 0.33%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and single mother households (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between West Indian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 128.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 69.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 17.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (41.3% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 31.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 49.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between West Indian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 32.7%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 28.3%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between West Indian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.89%), disability age over 75 (48.6% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.2%).