Carpatho Rusyn vs Guatemalan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Guatemalan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Guatemalans
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Guatemalan Integration in Carpatho Rusyn Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,959,936 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.674% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 673.9 Guatemalans.
Carpatho Rusyn vs Guatemalan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,248 compared to $37,766, a difference of 25.1%), median male earnings ($57,572 compared to $46,736, a difference of 23.2%), and median family income ($107,502 compared to $88,295, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $51,525, a difference of 4.9%), householder income over 65 years ($61,093 compared to $54,526, a difference of 12.0%), and median household income ($86,635 compared to $75,961, a difference of 14.1%).
Income Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Guatemalan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,248 | Tragic $37,766 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $107,502 | Tragic $88,295 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,635 | Tragic $75,961 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,617 | Tragic $41,205 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,572 | Tragic $46,736 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,825 | Tragic $35,695 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,113 | Poor $51,525 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,449 | Tragic $82,331 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,777 | Tragic $87,705 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,093 | Tragic $54,526 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Exceptional 22.6% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Guatemalan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 78.7%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 55.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.5%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father poverty (18.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.9%).
Poverty Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Guatemalan |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.5% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.5% | Tragic 21.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 21.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 21.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 21.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 23.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.0% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Tragic 32.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 14.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.4% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Guatemalan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 7.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Guatemalan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Tragic 18.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Guatemalan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Guatemalan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.0% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.8% | Tragic 35.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 87.0% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.2% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.5% | Tragic 81.2% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Guatemalan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 41.3%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 35.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.4%), married-couple households (45.7% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and family households (61.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 6.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Guatemalan |
Family Households | Tragic 61.1% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 28.9% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.7% | Tragic 43.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.06 | Exceptional 3.40 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 42.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.9% | Tragic 37.1% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.40%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Guatemalan |
No Vehicles Available | Fair 10.7% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.5% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Tragic 54.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.0% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Guatemalan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 152.0%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 60.2%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Education Level Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Guatemalan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Tragic 3.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.7% | Tragic 96.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 96.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 95.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 94.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 94.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 91.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 91.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 89.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 87.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Tragic 86.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Tragic 82.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.1% | Tragic 78.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.9% | Tragic 56.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Tragic 51.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.6% | Tragic 38.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.1% | Tragic 31.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.5% | Tragic 11.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Guatemalan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Disability Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Guatemalan |
Disability | Tragic 12.3% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.5% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Tragic 25.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 44.8% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |