Austrian vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 352,501,143 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to a decrease of 22.6 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,116 compared to $37,766, a difference of 27.4%), median male earnings ($59,359 compared to $46,736, a difference of 27.0%), and median family income ($111,306 compared to $88,295, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,898 compared to $51,525, a difference of 0.72%), median female earnings ($40,923 compared to $35,695, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,470 compared to $54,526, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 62.2%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 49.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.8%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 33.6%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.5%), and births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 24.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 110.1%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 48.9%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.5%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.81%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.5%).