Immigrants from Lebanon vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,935,593 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Immigrant from Lebanon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.493. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lebanon within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.539% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lebanon corresponds to an increase of 538.9 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($58,835 compared to $46,736, a difference of 25.9%), median family income ($110,159 compared to $88,295, a difference of 24.8%), and per capita income ($46,938 compared to $37,766, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,729 compared to $51,525, a difference of 1.6%), median female earnings ($41,183 compared to $35,695, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,521 compared to $54,526, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 34.1%), receiving food stamps (11.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 27.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and single father poverty (17.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 47.6%), births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 46.5%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.47%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.30 compared to 3.40, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 30.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 59.1%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 57.5%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 16.5%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.2%).